Quite a few science journalists have clued in to the fact that they were massively conned by the ENCODE publicity machine. Turns out that the death of junk DNA was greatly exaggerated.
Here's what Athena Andreadis has to say on the Scientific American website: Junk DNA, Junky PR. Athena is a professor in the Department of Cell and Developmental Biology at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Read more »
Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
Biology concepts – hydrogenosome, FeS cluster protein, loricifera, erythrocyte More than one way to skin a cat seems to be a newer versi...
-
Lab Times is a magazine that reports on news for life scientists in Europe. Their current issue (Sept. 14, 2011) has an "analysis...
-
As someone interested in linguistic recursion, I gotta join in... the below blog post has been getting a fair amount of attention around the...
-
My next door neighbor used to be the chair of the Immunology Department but Immunology recently moved to another floor of this building. The...
-
Biology concepts – fever, infectious disease, sexually transmitted disease, innate immune system Would you be willing to be a human guinea...
-
Many proteins bind to double-stranded DNA and most of them bind specifically to a particular target site. The lac repressor, for example, b...
-
I claim that the top three criteria for good science reporting are: Accuracy, Accuracy, and Accuracy. Everything else falls into fourth plac...
-
I met many interesting people at Eschaton 2012 in Ottawa. One of them was Ian Cromwell who gave a talk about racism on Sunday morning. Ian ...
-
Biology Concepts – pollen, plastid inheritance, gymnosperms, angiosperms I am coming to believe that plants are more complex than animals, e...
-
I just heard from Dave Greig that Richard Harter died over a month ago [ Richard Harter 1935 - 2012 ]. He was a long time contributor to tal...